<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>England for Obama &#187; george bush crimes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.englandforobama.com/tag/george-bush-crimes/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.englandforobama.com</link>
	<description>Backing from across the Pond</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 15:07:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>To move on, or not to move on?</title>
		<link>http://www.englandforobama.com/to-move-on-or-not-to-move-on</link>
		<comments>http://www.englandforobama.com/to-move-on-or-not-to-move-on#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 08:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrea</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[George Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barack obama news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bush crimes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bush investigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bush torture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bush wire-tapping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dawn johnsen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[george bush crimes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[george bush torture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama investigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.englandforobama.com/?p=4607</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#8217;s the question facing Obama when it comes to pursuing the Bush administration for crimes such as torture and wire-tapping. And from the sounds of his interview on ABC yesterday, he&#8217;s still unsure (watch the video here).
As the Huffington Post piece notes, however:
&#8220;As pointed out by Think Progress, Dawn Johnsen, Obama&#8217;s choice to lead the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s the question facing Obama when it comes to pursuing the Bush administration for crimes such as torture and wire-tapping. And from the sounds of his interview on ABC yesterday, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/01/11/obama-leaves-door-open-to_n_156910.html" target="_blank">he&#8217;s still unsure</a> (watch the video <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/video/playerIndex?id=6621533" target="_blank">here</a>).</p>
<p>As the <em>Huffington Post</em> piece notes, however:</p>
<p><em>&#8220;As <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/01/11/obama-special-prosecutor-torture/">pointed out by Think Progress</a>, Dawn Johnsen, Obama&#8217;s choice to lead the Office of Legal Counsel, has said that the next president should avoid &#8220;any temptation to simply move on.&#8221; Here is the relevant quote:</em></p>
<blockquote><p><em>&#8216;We must avoid any temptation simply to move on. We must instead be honest with ourselves and the world as we condemn our nation&#8217;s past transgressions and reject Bush&#8217;s corruption of our American ideals. Our constitutional democracy cannot survive with a government shrouded in secrecy, nor can our nation&#8217;s honor be restored without full disclosure.&#8217;&#8221;</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Obama&#8217;s response to this issue strikes me as his usual pitch-perfect politics. The man is naturally forward-thinking, that rare breed: an optimistic and (yes) hopeful politician. But he also seems to hold certain strong beliefs and values (such as &#8216;torture is wrong&#8217;). So how <em>do</em> you balance those things? How do you look forward &#8211; get the country to be excited and optimistic and hopeful with you &#8211; while also look backward, at the horrific, dark realities of what has been performed in your name? </p>
<p>And while I understand this pitch-perfect playing &#8211; and realise that what Obama is mooting now won&#8217;t necessarily reflect his actions in the upcoming weeks and months &#8211; I think there&#8217;s a lot to be said for being unable to truly move forward without addressing the issues of the past. And I think there&#8217;s even more to be said for not letting Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld <em>et al</em> get away with the crimes they committed. We&#8217;ll see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.englandforobama.com/to-move-on-or-not-to-move-on/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
